On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 10:13:55 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> writes:
>
> > Changes from v1:
> > * Preserve udiv_qrnnd as a separate division primitive that
> > could be used as a building block for float128 division.
> > * Include asm fragments for x86_64, s390x, and ppc64.
>
> It passes my fops fdiv_double test but Emilio's test is reporting:
>
> Errors found in f64_div, rounding near_even:
> +252.7FFFFFFFFFF80 +001.FFFFFFFFFFFFE
> => +64F.7FFFFFFFFFF82 ....x expected +64F.7FFFFFFFFFF81 ....x
Did you rebuild the test program? v2 passes all f64_div tests for me.
Tested-by: Emilio G. Cota <c...@braap.org>
for patches 1 and 2.
Thanks,
E.
