On 09/18/2017 12:22 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > On 09/18/2017 06:51 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> kvm-s390 is wrong. This is general s390x and should be named s390/s390x >> and GuestPanicInformationS390(x). One can argue about s390 v s390x. See >> last comment in this mail. > > > Yes, will remove the kvm part and only use s390. Not sure about s390 vs. > s390x. > I slightly prefer the s390 name as in the kernel but I really do not care if > we follow the s390x as in QEMU. Conny, any opinion?
Note that qemu is inconsistent here: target/s390x tcg/s390 which is arguably exactly wrong because target/s390x handles 32-bit mode, whereas tcg/s390 requires 64-bit mode. ;-) r~
