On 23.06.2015 14:49, Thomas Huth wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2015 14:42:35 +0200 > Michal Privoznik <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 23.06.2015 14:37, Peter Maydell wrote: >>> On 23 June 2015 at 13:30, Michal Privoznik <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I'm used to run 'make -j5 all check'. However, this is not possible in >>>> qemu because of the missing dependency in the Makefile. If I do that, >>>> tests are usually started with build and since not everything is built >>>> yet, they often fail too. Moreover, we should run test suite only >>>> after every binary we want to test has been built. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <[email protected]> >>>> --- >>>> Makefile | 1 + >>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile >>>> index e7c5c3a..67eeb87 100644 >>>> --- a/Makefile >>>> +++ b/Makefile >>>> @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ dummy := $(call unnest-vars,, \ >>>> >>>> ifneq ($(wildcard config-host.mak),) >>>> include $(SRC_PATH)/tests/Makefile >>>> +check: all >>>> endif >>>> ifeq ($(CONFIG_SMARTCARD_NSS),y) >>>> include $(SRC_PATH)/libcacard/Makefile >>> >>> I'm having difficulty understanding the use of conditionals >>> in our makefile -- can you explain why inside this ifneq >>> rather than outside is the right place for this dependency? >> >> Well, I guess it could be outside too. My thinking was, that we include >> the tests/Makefile - which defines the 'check' target - only >> conditionally, therefore the dependency should be defined only sometimes >> too. I guess it won't hurt if it was outside too. > > Maybe it's simpler to add the dependency into tests/Makefile instead? >
Yeah, that could work too. For some reason I thought that having it there would result in making 'all' just under tests/. But Now that I tried it out it works just nicely. Do you want me to post v2 or is that something that can be fixed just before pushing? Michal
