On 01/30/2015 08:02 AM, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Hmm, so perhaps my idea for a later improvement: > >> > Eventually we might want to move the new inline functions into a >> > separate header to be included from softfloat.h instead of softfloat.c, >> > but let's make changes one step at a time. > will actually have to be made right away. I suspect GCC is more liberal > here due to its convoluted extern/static/inline semantics history. > Sigh...
GCC 5 is moving to -std=gnu11 as default, and so will have the same problem. r~
