On 30 January 2015 at 16:02, Maciej W. Rozycki <[email protected]> wrote: > Hmm, so perhaps my idea for a later improvement: > >> Eventually we might want to move the new inline functions into a >> separate header to be included from softfloat.h instead of softfloat.c, >> but let's make changes one step at a time. > > will actually have to be made right away. I suspect GCC is more liberal > here due to its convoluted extern/static/inline semantics history. > Sigh...
I would suggest just using "static inline", as we do elsewhere for little utility functions. -- PMM
