Am 21.08.2014 05:37, schrieb Peter Crosthwaite:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Alistair Francis <alistai...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Alistair Francis <alistai...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> diff --git a/target-arm/cpu-qom.h b/target-arm/cpu-qom.h
>>> index 07f3c9e..7e415f5 100644
>>> --- a/target-arm/cpu-qom.h
>>> +++ b/target-arm/cpu-qom.h
>>> @@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ typedef struct ARMCPU {
>>> uint32_t id_isar3;
>>> uint32_t id_isar4;
>>> uint32_t id_isar5;
>>> + uint32_t rom_address;
>
> Any reason for this to go in amongst the ID register fields? It seems
> in a class of its own, and the closest thing to it would be rvbar
> which is down the bottom. My gut says it should be last field in the
> struct.
Whether it is zero'ed on reset here would be another concern.
Regards,
Andreas
>>> uint64_t id_aa64pfr0;
>>> uint64_t id_aa64pfr1;
>>> uint64_t id_aa64dfr0;
[snip]
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
