On 06/28/13 20:54, Seiji Aguchi wrote:
> 
>>> diff --git a/include/qemu/time.h b/include/qemu/time.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..f70739b
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/include/qemu/time.h
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
>>> +#ifndef TIME_H
>>> +#define TIME_H
>>
>> I wonder if TIME_H is maybe a bit too nondescript and could conflict
>> with other guards.
>>
>> The guards currently used in "include/qemu/*.h" files are inconsistent
>> -- some use a QEMU_ prefix, some a __QEMU_ one, and others use none.
>>
>> Don't respin just because of this, but maybe it's something to consider.
> 
> This should be discussed in other thread...

Ah, right, apologies for the ambiguity. I just meant that either
QEMU_TIME_H or __QEMU_TIME_H would have a lower chance to clash with
another guard than plain TIME_H -- "some" prefix would be nice, but I
couldn't point out a specific one, because the current practice varies.
I didn't mean to suggest that you should unify the prefixes across all
guards!

Anyway, even my QEMU_TIME_H / __QEMU_TIME_H suggestion is tangential;
feel free to ignore it.

Thanks
Laszlo


Reply via email to