On 23.02.2013, at 19:27, Andreas Färber wrote: > Am 23.02.2013 17:15, schrieb Andreas Färber: >> Am 22.02.2013 16:21, schrieb Alexander Graf: >>> After this patch set, the -cpu ? list is split into 2 segments. >>> >>> I would prefer if we could in the help output revert to the old behavior of >>> only a single list ordered by PVR. Let me show you what I'm thinking of: >>> >>>> PowerPC 601_v1 PVR 00010001 >>> [...] >>>> PowerPC 740_v3.1 PVR 00080301 >>> 740 (alias to "PowerPC 740_v3.1) >>>> PowerPC 750cx_v1.0 PVR 00082100 >> >> How do you imagine this to be implemented then? Per ObjectClass walk the >> aliases list for aliases that resolve to the same type? > > Didn't come up with a more efficient implementation: > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/222738/
Yeah, it does exactly what I would like it to do, just that it's a bit slow :). On my 970 system it takes almost 6 seconds to show the CPU list. $ time ./ppc-softmmu/qemu-system-ppc -cpu '?' [...] real 0m5.899s user 0m5.856s sys 0m0.025s I don't think it's a major issue - you don't show the CPU list every day. But if you can come up with something faster, I wouldn't mind it ;). For the time being, this version is good. Alex
