Am 22.02.2013 16:21, schrieb Alexander Graf: > After this patch set, the -cpu ? list is split into 2 segments. > > I would prefer if we could in the help output revert to the old behavior of > only a single list ordered by PVR. Let me show you what I'm thinking of: > >> PowerPC 601_v1 PVR 00010001 > [...] >> PowerPC 740_v3.1 PVR 00080301 > 740 (alias to "PowerPC 740_v3.1) >> PowerPC 750cx_v1.0 PVR 00082100
How do you imagine this to be implemented then? Per ObjectClass walk the aliases list for aliases that resolve to the same type? What about "host" presentation? My patch just put it into a third segment, we can easily drop the \n line though. See also Jan's patch for x86 adding a description for "host". A related question is whether to expose the aliases via QMP. That should be easier to implement, similar to how aliases are handled right now. > [...] > > I also think the alias list should go into cpu-models.c. OK, becomes extern and typedef needs to go into header then. Andreas -- SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
