On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 01:36:25PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Mark Cave-Ayland <[email protected]> writes:
> 
> > Following recent discussions on the mailing list, it has been decided
> > that instead of mapping -cpu host and -cpu max to a suitable 32-bit x86 CPU,
> > it is preferable to disallow them and use the existing valid_cpu_types
> > validation logic so that an error is returned to the user instead.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  hw/i386/isapc.c | 27 ---------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 27 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/i386/isapc.c b/hw/i386/isapc.c
> > index 44f4a44672..6c35a397df 100644
> > --- a/hw/i386/isapc.c
> > +++ b/hw/i386/isapc.c
> > @@ -41,31 +41,6 @@ static void pc_init_isa(MachineState *machine)
> >      DriveInfo *hd[MAX_IDE_BUS * MAX_IDE_DEVS];
> >      int i;
> >  
> > -    /*
> > -     * There is a small chance that someone unintentionally passes "-cpu 
> > max"
> > -     * for the isapc machine, which will provide a much more modern 32-bit
> > -     * CPU than would be expected for an ISA-era PC. If the "max" cpu type 
> > has
> > -     * been specified, choose the "best" 32-bit cpu possible which we 
> > consider
> > -     * be the pentium3 (deliberately choosing an Intel CPU given that the
> > -     * default 486 CPU for the isapc machine is also an Intel CPU).
> > -     */
> > -    if (!strcmp(machine->cpu_type, X86_CPU_TYPE_NAME("max"))) {
> > -        machine->cpu_type = X86_CPU_TYPE_NAME("pentium3");
> > -        warn_report("-cpu max is invalid for isapc machine, using 
> > pentium3");
> > -    }
> > -
> > -    /*
> > -     * Similarly if someone unintentionally passes "-cpu host" for the 
> > isapc
> > -     * machine then display a warning and also switch to the "best" 32-bit
> > -     * cpu possible which we consider to be the pentium3. This is because 
> > any
> > -     * host CPU will already be modern than this, but it also ensures any
> > -     * newer CPU flags/features are filtered out for older guests.
> > -     */
> > -    if (!strcmp(machine->cpu_type, X86_CPU_TYPE_NAME("host"))) {
> > -        machine->cpu_type = X86_CPU_TYPE_NAME("pentium3");
> > -        warn_report("-cpu host is invalid for isapc machine, using 
> > pentium3");
> > -    }
> > -
> >      if (machine->ram_size > 3.5 * GiB) {
> >          error_report("Too much memory for this machine: %" PRId64 " MiB, "
> >                       "maximum 3584 MiB", machine->ram_size / MiB);
> > @@ -162,8 +137,6 @@ static void isapc_machine_options(MachineClass *m)
> >          X86_CPU_TYPE_NAME("pentium2"),
> >          X86_CPU_TYPE_NAME("pentium3"),
> >          X86_CPU_TYPE_NAME("qemu32"),
> > -        X86_CPU_TYPE_NAME("max"),
> > -        X86_CPU_TYPE_NAME("host"),
> >          NULL
> >      };
> >      PCMachineClass *pcmc = PC_MACHINE_CLASS(m);
> 
> This reverts the "smart" part of recent
> 
> commit e1e2909f8e74051a34a044940f90d4650b6e784a
> Author: Mark Cave-Ayland <[email protected]>
> Date:   Thu Aug 28 12:09:44 2025 +0100
> 
>     hw/i386/pc_piix.c: restrict isapc machine to 32-bit CPUs
>     
>     The isapc machine represents a legacy ISA PC with a 486 CPU. Whilst it is
>     possible to specify any CPU via -cpu on the command line, it makes no
>     sense to allow modern 64-bit CPUs to be used.
>     
>     Restrict the isapc machine to the available 32-bit CPUs, taking care to
>     handle the case where if a user inadvertently uses either -cpu max or
>     -cpu host then the "best" 32-bit CPU is used (in this case the pentium3).

What is written here made sense from the POV of use of isapc with
qemu-system-x86_64, but in qemu-system-i686, both 'max' and 'host'
where already 32-bit CPUs IIUC. Both this original patch and
the new patch block them from being used in qemu-system-i686
which feels wrong given the justification above.


With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|


Reply via email to