>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/19] intel_iommu: Check for compatibility with
>IOMMUFD backed device when x-flts=on
>
>Hi Zhenzhong,
>
>On 6/20/25 9:18 AM, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
>> When vIOMMU is configured x-flts=on in scalable mode, stage-1 page table
>> is passed to host to construct nested page table. We need to check
>> compatibility of some critical IOMMU capabilities between vIOMMU and
>> host IOMMU to ensure guest stage-1 page table could be used by host.
>>
>> For instance, vIOMMU supports stage-1 1GB huge page mapping, but host
>> does not, then this IOMMUFD backed device should be failed.
>s/should be/should
>
>You may add in the commit message than even of the checks pass, for now
>we willingly reject the association because all the bits are not there yet.

Will do.

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l....@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.d...@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h |  1 +
>>  hw/i386/intel_iommu.c          | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
>> index 7aba259ef8..18bc22fc72 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
>> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu_internal.h
>> @@ -192,6 +192,7 @@
>>  #define VTD_ECAP_PT                 (1ULL << 6)
>>  #define VTD_ECAP_SC                 (1ULL << 7)
>>  #define VTD_ECAP_MHMV               (15ULL << 20)
>> +#define VTD_ECAP_NEST               (1ULL << 26)
>>  #define VTD_ECAP_SRS                (1ULL << 31)
>>  #define VTD_ECAP_PASID              (1ULL << 40)
>>  #define VTD_ECAP_SMTS               (1ULL << 43)
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>> index e90fd2f28f..1c79efc1cb 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/intel_iommu.c
>> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
>>  #include "kvm/kvm_i386.h"
>>  #include "migration/vmstate.h"
>>  #include "trace.h"
>> +#include "system/iommufd.h"
>>
>>  /* context entry operations */
>>  #define VTD_CE_GET_RID2PASID(ce) \
>> @@ -4355,6 +4356,33 @@ static bool vtd_check_hiod(IntelIOMMUState *s,
>HostIOMMUDevice *hiod,
>>          return true;
>>      }
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_IOMMUFD
>> +    struct HostIOMMUDeviceCaps *caps = &hiod->caps;
>> +    struct iommu_hw_info_vtd *vtd = &caps->vendor_caps.vtd;
>> +
>> +    /* Remaining checks are all stage-1 translation specific */
>> +    if (!object_dynamic_cast(OBJECT(hiod),
>TYPE_HOST_IOMMU_DEVICE_IOMMUFD)) {
>> +        error_setg(errp, "Need IOMMUFD backend when x-flts=on");
>> +        return false;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (caps->type != IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_INTEL_VTD) {
>> +        error_setg(errp, "Incompatible host platform IOMMU type %d",
>> +                   caps->type);
>> +        return false;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (!(vtd->ecap_reg & VTD_ECAP_NEST)) {
>> +        error_setg(errp, "Host IOMMU doesn't support nested translation");
>> +        return false;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (s->fs1gp && !(vtd->cap_reg & VTD_CAP_FS1GP)) {
>> +        error_setg(errp, "Stage-1 1GB huge page is unsupported by host 
>> IOMMU");
>> +        return false;
>> +    }
>> +#endif
>> +
>>      error_setg(errp, "host device is uncompatible with stage-1 
>> translation");
>s/uncompatible/incompatible
>s/device/IOMMU

Will do.

Thanks
Zhenzhong

Reply via email to