On 16/12/2024 17:33, Cédric Le Goater wrote: > On 12/16/24 16:37, Joao Martins wrote: >> On 16/12/2024 14:45, Avihai Horon wrote: >>> On 16/12/2024 14:00, Joao Martins wrote: >>>> On 16/12/2024 09:46, Avihai Horon wrote: >>>> I also have a much >>>> smaller series for that sort of unblockage that I can give you a pointer. >>> >>> Yes, if you have it at hand, that could be useful for testing next versions. >>> >>>> Though, eventually the optimizations we will do for VF dirty tracking for >>>> vIOMMU >>>> will apply to IOMMU HW too just so we minimize the amount of calls to get >>>> dirty >>>> bits. >>>> >>>>> I didn't test it with iommu DPT as I don't have access to such HW. >>>>> Cedric, I remember you said that you have such HW, it would be very >>>>> helpful if you could test it. >>>>> >>>> I am starting to prep the unblocking vIOMMU for Qemu 10, so I can validate >>>> if >>>> this series works as well -- but from what I have looked so far it should >>>> be >>>> all >>>> OK. >>> >>> Thanks, that wouldn't hurt :) >>> >>>> If it helps I have some pending series that lets you test emulated x86 >>>> IOMMU >>>> DPT support (either on intel-iommu or amd-iommu) that can help you when you >>>> don't have the hardware to test. >>> >>> That would be great, I didn't know such thing existed. >>> >> >> I did post it, but it was some time ago (2y). While I got some comments, but >> failed to follow-up: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20220428211351.3897-1- >> joao.m.mart...@oracle.com/#t >> >> The link above has bugs, but let me conjure the version alongside vIOMMU and >> the >> other stuff I mentioned earlier. > > Please Cc: me next time. >
OK
