On 16/12/2024 14:45, Avihai Horon wrote: > On 16/12/2024 14:00, Joao Martins wrote: >> On 16/12/2024 09:46, Avihai Horon wrote: >> I also have a much >> smaller series for that sort of unblockage that I can give you a pointer. > > Yes, if you have it at hand, that could be useful for testing next versions. > >> Though, eventually the optimizations we will do for VF dirty tracking for >> vIOMMU >> will apply to IOMMU HW too just so we minimize the amount of calls to get >> dirty >> bits. >> >>> I didn't test it with iommu DPT as I don't have access to such HW. >>> Cedric, I remember you said that you have such HW, it would be very >>> helpful if you could test it. >>> >> I am starting to prep the unblocking vIOMMU for Qemu 10, so I can validate if >> this series works as well -- but from what I have looked so far it should be >> all >> OK. > > Thanks, that wouldn't hurt :) > >> If it helps I have some pending series that lets you test emulated x86 IOMMU >> DPT support (either on intel-iommu or amd-iommu) that can help you when you >> don't have the hardware to test. > > That would be great, I didn't know such thing existed. >
I did post it, but it was some time ago (2y). While I got some comments, but failed to follow-up: https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20220428211351.3897-1-joao.m.mart...@oracle.com/#t The link above has bugs, but let me conjure the version alongside vIOMMU and the other stuff I mentioned earlier.
