On 31/10/23 16:43, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 15:39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> wrote:
On 27/9/23 17:12, Peter Maydell wrote:
Convert docs/specs/virt-ctlr.txt to rST format.
I added the name of the device to give readers a bit more idea
of which device we're actually documenting here.
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]>
---
docs/specs/index.rst | 1 +
docs/specs/{virt-ctlr.txt => virt-ctlr.rst} | 12 +++++-------
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
rename docs/specs/{virt-ctlr.txt => virt-ctlr.rst} (70%)
$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f docs/specs/virt-ctlr.txt
get_maintainer.pl: No maintainers found, printing recent contributors.
get_maintainer.pl: Do not blindly cc: them on patches! Use common sense.
$ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f hw/misc/virt_ctrl.c
Laurent Vivier <[email protected]> (maintainer:virt)
[email protected] (open list:All patches CC here)
Cc'ing Laurent.
That raises the question, is it intentional that the doc
is virt-ctlr but the source file is virt-ctrl ? Should we
rename one of them (looks like the doc, so easy enough to
do as part of this patch)?
$ git grep ctlr| wc -l
430
$ git grep ctrl| wc -l
4063
Since you are already renaming the file, correcting the typo
in the same file seems like a good idea.
