On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 15:39, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 27/9/23 17:12, Peter Maydell wrote: > > Convert docs/specs/virt-ctlr.txt to rST format. > > > > I added the name of the device to give readers a bit more idea > > of which device we're actually documenting here. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <[email protected]> > > --- > > docs/specs/index.rst | 1 + > > docs/specs/{virt-ctlr.txt => virt-ctlr.rst} | 12 +++++------- > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > rename docs/specs/{virt-ctlr.txt => virt-ctlr.rst} (70%) > > > $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f docs/specs/virt-ctlr.txt > get_maintainer.pl: No maintainers found, printing recent contributors. > get_maintainer.pl: Do not blindly cc: them on patches! Use common sense. > > $ ./scripts/get_maintainer.pl -f hw/misc/virt_ctrl.c > Laurent Vivier <[email protected]> (maintainer:virt) > [email protected] (open list:All patches CC here) > > Cc'ing Laurent.
That raises the question, is it intentional that the doc is virt-ctlr but the source file is virt-ctrl ? Should we rename one of them (looks like the doc, so easy enough to do as part of this patch)? thanks -- PMM
