Hi Kay,

The deletion of the index.html is not published:
https://cms.apache.org/ooo-site/publish?diff=1

Regards,

   Matthias


Am 09.06.2018 um 19:20 schrieb Kay Schenk:
> Keith, short update -- see below
>
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 9:31 AM, Kay Schenk <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2018 at 12:03 PM, Keith N. McKenna <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/8/2018 12:54 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>> On 06/07/2018 12:41 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>>>> On 5/7/2018 12:48 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, May 6, 2018 at 3:48 PM, Keith N. McKenna <
>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/3/2018 12:19 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>>> I think the first level of organization should be by application
>>>>>>>>>>> (Writer, Calc, etc).  After that It will depend on how we want
>>> to use
>>>>>>>>>>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained
>>>>>>> units
>>>>>>>>>>> that people could volunteer to execute.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Keith
>>>>>>>>>> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc,
>>> etc.
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> sounds ideal.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification?
>>>>>>>>> What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder
>>>>>>>>> structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit
>>> them
>>>>>>>>> into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would
>>> either
>>>>>>>>> have to open every file and hope the description either tells you
>>> are
>>>>>>>>> can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory
>>> structure on
>>>>>>>>> the TestLink site and match the test numbers.
>>>>>>>> That's great Keith. I realize now in hindsight that I should have
>>> done
>>>>>>>> this as well. :(
>>>>>>>> I can go back and do this but it will take some time given my
>>> current
>>>>>>>> personal schedule.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would it be possible for you to set up an area under --
>>>>>>>> https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and just use your structure so we can take a look?
>>>>>>> Kay;
>>>>>>> I can do that later in the week, but understand that the structure
>>> was
>>>>>>> somewhat different for each application depending on the internals of
>>>>>>> the application. For example Impress has a lot of tests for different
>>>>>>> type of animations where I do not believe Writer uses them much at
>>> all.
>>>>>> ​The organizational structure used for the test case setup seemed
>>> mostly to
>>>>>> be dependent on what the QA folks thought needed to be tested at the
>>> time
>>>>>> which is why ​
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ​I didn't put all that much effort into keeping it the way it was on
>>>>>> TestLInk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ​
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will try to comit my Impress structure later in the week. I am busy
>>>>>>> with Dr. appointments the bigining of the week.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ​Sounds good!
>>>>> Kay; I committed the Directory Structure I used for impress files to
>>> the
>>>>> ManualTest directory. It appeared to build but they do not show on the
>>>>> production website. Is there something else I should have changed?
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry for taking so long, but with medical issues with my girlfriend
>>> and
>>>>> some personal issues of my own the last month has been hectic.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Keith
>>>> Hi Keith --
>>>> No worries. I'll take a look. Did you "publish" your changes after
>>>> committing?
>>> No was not aware of that step or how to do it. I rarely use my committer
>>> privileges as I am not a coder in any way shape or form. I used to use
>>> the cms to make minor changes to the aoo site but that no longer appears
>>> to work. If you do not mind giving me a quick rundown on how I will be
>>> glad to do that in the future.
>>>
>> ​
>> Typically, the sequence of events for changes to the web server is to:
>>  * commit your changes,
>>  * review on the staging server (ooo-site staging
>> <http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/>),
>>  *  then publish to the production server if all is well.
>>
>> I use the "Easy Publish" facility from ​ https://cms.apache.org/​.
>> Once you supply your ASF credentials, navigate to ooo-site, and just click
>> "Publish ooo-site".
>>
>> For now, I deleted the old index.html. I will need to modify the script to
>> accommodate directory structures rather just a list of files. So, hopefully
>> by mid-week, we will have the Impress items "show up". Thank you again for
>> all your work.
>>
> ​This deletion did not seem to "take" in publishing. So, for now, things
> look as they did. Your new Impress area is there, but the index.html file
> needs to be regenerated.
> ​
>
>
>> ​
>>
>>> BTW I see that you use a PGP key to sign the e-mails but it has never
>>> been uploaded to a key server. If you send me the public key I will add
>>> it to my keyring.
>>>
>> ​Normally, my PGP key is not in use. It gets requested in Thunderbird when
>> I respond to a "signed" message like yours.
>> ​
>>
>>
>>> Regards
>>> Keith
>>>> If you did, then I'll need to modify my little index creation creation
>>>> script to pull in your additions likely this weekend sometime.
>>>> Thanks so much for your work on this,
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> MzK
>>
>> "Less is MORE."
>>
>
>


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to