On 05/02/2018 11:05 AM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: > On 4/25/2018 3:59 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> On 04/24/2018 03:25 PM, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >>> On 4/18/2018 6:22 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> <snip> > I think the first level of organization should be by application >>> (Writer, Calc, etc). After that It will depend on how we want to use >>> them.My preference would be to break them down into finer grained units >>> that people could volunteer to execute. >>> >>> Regards >>> Keith >> Organizing the cases with respect to AOO module -- Writer, Calc, etc. -- >> sounds ideal. >> >> Do we have any ideas for how to perform this classification? > What I have done with the Impress ones was to use the same folder > structure as that used on the TestLink site. that way I can fit them > into whatever structure we decide upon. At this point you would either > have to open every file and hope the description either tells you are > can be easily derived, or manually go through the directory structure on > the TestLink site and match the test numbers. That's great Keith. I realize now in hindsight that I should have done this as well. :( I can go back and do this but it will take some time given my current personal schedule.
Would it be possible for you to set up an area under -- https://www.openoffice.org/qa/testcase/ManualTesting/ and just use your structure so we can take a look? > > I believe that a deeper level of granularity is needed that just the > application. > > Regards > Keith > <snip> > > -- ------------------------------------------ MzK "Less is MORE."
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
