On 10/22/25 7:14 PM, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote: > And that's why it's so frustrating when someone bases their entire > argument on an AI's nonsense. If the OP had simply posted it as a > request, with no hallucinated claims, it would have been a > straight-forward matter to explain the Unicode standard and its > requirements. Instead, we get a series of slop posts that, no doubt, > will be crawled by further AI trainers, reinforcing the fiction.
The other day one of my own forum posts from years ago was cited by Google's AI summary when I asked it a particular question on an esoteric subject. I'm somewhat confident that what I had originally written years ago is accurate, but I'm not *that* confident and was hoping to find some other evidence to confirm or deny what I thought. A bit jarring to see AI use my own post like that. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman3//lists/python-list.python.org
