On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 at 12:01, Michael Torrie via Python-list <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 10/19/25 12:38 PM, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote: > > The entire premise of your post was flat-out wrong. Your data was > > nothing but hallucinations, and there is nothing to discuss. I'm not > > even going to bother reading further, because every post you've > > written smells like AI slop. > > Interesting. Even a google search AI summary says (quite confidently of > course) that Java 9 and Swift both follow the unicode standard and use > "SS." Maybe he asked the wrong AI about that!
And that's why it's so frustrating when someone bases their entire argument on an AI's nonsense. If the OP had simply posted it as a request, with no hallucinated claims, it would have been a straight-forward matter to explain the Unicode standard and its requirements. Instead, we get a series of slop posts that, no doubt, will be crawled by further AI trainers, reinforcing the fiction. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman3//lists/python-list.python.org
