Yes, it would probably make more sense to split the editor and shell processes as many Python IDEs do, with IDLE running in CPython and the user's computation running in the chosen interpreter.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: >> On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:33:38 +0200 >> Simon Cross <hodgestar+python...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Having a standalone version of IDLE might be really useful to >>> alternative Python implementations. >> >> Why? > > I don't think it's worth discussing - tkinter does not work on any > other implementation than CPython and it seems it won't work. It's a > bit pity, but I guess if I felt really bad about it, I should just > make it work. > > PS. are there idle projects in SoC? Maybe we should put a more > pypy-friendly one there too? > > Cheers, > fijal > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/dholth%40gmail.com _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
