On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 08:33:38 +0200 > Simon Cross <hodgestar+python...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Having a standalone version of IDLE might be really useful to >> alternative Python implementations. > > Why?
I don't think it's worth discussing - tkinter does not work on any other implementation than CPython and it seems it won't work. It's a bit pity, but I guess if I felt really bad about it, I should just make it work. PS. are there idle projects in SoC? Maybe we should put a more pypy-friendly one there too? Cheers, fijal _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
