On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Jeff Hardy <jdha...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Nick's option 2 would be an improvement, but I imagine that option 3 > > would have been the most effective by far. Of course, the key thing > > is how closely the various implementors would follow the new list. > > Only they could say, though Frank Wierzbicki seemed positive about it. > > This has come up a couple of times recently (discussions on PEP 421 > and PEP 405), so I think it would be worth while. I don't have the > time to track all of the different proposals that are in flux; it > would be nice to know when they're "done" and just need a sanity check > to make sure everything will work for other implementations. > > Yes, perhaps if the list were *just* a place to cc: in or send a heads-up to python-dev discussions, and not to have actual list discussions per se, that would do the trick. IOW, the idea is, "If you're a contributor to a non-CPython implementation, subscribe here to get a heads-up on Python-Dev discussions you should be following." Not, "here's a list to discuss Python implementations in general", and definitely not a place to *actually conduct discussions* at all: the only things ever posted there should be cc:'d from or to Python-Dev, or be pointers to Python-Dev threads. That way, we'd have a solution for the periodic, "hmm, we should get other implementations to weigh in on this thread" problem, that wouldn't actually divide the discussion. Instead, we'd have a "Bat Signal" (Snake Signal?) to bring the other heroes in to meet with Commissioner Guido. ;-)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
