On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nick's option 2 would be an improvement, but I imagine that option 3 > would have been the most effective by far. Of course, the key thing > is how closely the various implementors would follow the new list. > Only they could say, though Frank Wierzbicki seemed positive about it.
This has come up a couple of times recently (discussions on PEP 421 and PEP 405), so I think it would be worth while. I don't have the time to track all of the different proposals that are in flux; it would be nice to know when they're "done" and just need a sanity check to make sure everything will work for other implementations. - Jeff _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
