On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 08:22:20AM +0200, Stefan Behnel wrote: > Matt Billenstein, 17.04.2011 00:47: > >On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 01:30:13PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >>On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 00:41:03 +0000 > >>Matt Billenstein wrote: > >>> > >>>Slightly less crude benchmark showing simplejson is quite a bit faster: > >>> > >>>http://pastebin.com/g1WqUPwm > >>> > >>>250ms vs 5.5s encoding and decoding an 11KB json object 1000 times... > >> > >>This doesn't have much value if you don't say which version of Python > >>you ran json with. You should use 3.2, otherwise you might miss some > >>optimizations. > > > >Yes, that was 2.6.5 -- 3.2 native json is comparable to simplejson here > >taking > >about 330ms... > > From the POV of CPython 3.2, is "native" Python or C?
"Native" as in the version that ships with 3.2. And actually I think my test with 2.6.5 wasn't using the C extension for some reason so that 5.5s number isn't right -- a fresh build of 2.7.1 gives me a runtime of around 350ms. m -- Matt Billenstein m...@vazor.com http://www.vazor.com/ _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
