On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 23:48:45 +0100 Michael Foord <fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk> wrote:
> On 16/04/2011 22:28, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > > Am 16.04.2011 21:13, schrieb Vinay Sajip: > >> Martin v. Löwis<martin<at> v.loewis.de> writes: > >> > >>> Does it actually need improvement? > >> I can't actually say, but I assume it keeps changing for the better - > >> albeit > >> slowly. I wasn't thinking of specific improvements, just the idea of > >> continuous > >> improvement in general... > > Hmm. I cannot believe in the notion of "continuous improvement"; I'd > > guess that it is rather "continuous change". > > > > I can see three possible areas of improvment: > > 1. Bugs: if there are any, they should clearly be fixed. However, JSON > > is a simple format, so the implementation should be able to converge > > to something fairly correct quickly. > > 2. Performance: there is always room for performance improvements. > > However, I strongly recommend to not bother unless a severe > > bottleneck can be demonstrated. > Well, there was a 5x speedup demonstrated comparing simplejson to the > standard library json module. No. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
