On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:49:39 +1000 Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 9:45 PM, John Arbash Meinel > <j...@arbash-meinel.com> wrote: > > I don't specifically know what is in those 340 tests, but 18min/340 = > > 3.2s for each test. Which is *much* longer than simple smoke tests would > > have to be. > > The counts Barry is referring to there are actually counting test > *files*, rather than individual tests. We only have 359 of those in > total though (not counting those in subdirectories), so a "quicktest" > that omits less than 6% of them doesn't sound particularly quick (even > if it does leave out the slowest ones). > > We should probably do another pass and add a few more tests to the > blacklist in the Makefile template (starting with > test_concurrent_futures).
Does anyone use "make quicktest" for something useful? There is a reason the regression test suite has many tests... "Blacklisting" some of them sounds like a bad thing to do. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
