On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 2:19 AM, Farshid Lashkari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Jesse Noller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I would like to renew the discussion now that "there is a PEP" to see >> if there are any outstanding things people would like to get resolved. >> I chose to continue to push it for 2.6 / 3.0 inclusion due to feedback >> both here and elsewhere that people would rather see this in sooner in >> some form, rather than later (i.e.: 2.7/3.1). > > I'm not sure if this is a big issue, but I just tested the module with > an application that embeds Python and it doesn't work properly. > Instead of spawning worker threads using python.exe, it attempts to > use the application. Does the processing module allow specifying the > exe to use for spawning worker threads? I would definitely like to see > this included in the next release, and having support for embedded > Python interpreters would be a big plus. > > -Farshid >
Let's take this off-list Farshid - but I would like to know more about your application (I'm not up to speed with embedding python in other applications) so I can either add it to the PEP or discuss how best to address this within the module itself. -jesse _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
