I would like to renew the discussion now that "there is a PEP" to see
if there are any outstanding things people would like to get resolved.
I chose to continue to push it for 2.6 / 3.0 inclusion due to feedback
both here and elsewhere that people would rather see this in sooner in
some form, rather than later (i.e.: 2.7/3.1).

+1 from me (under the 'multiprocessing' name, with the understanding that
some code duplication with other parts of the standard library may still
remain in 2.6/3.0).

+1 from me as well, and I support the rename to multiprocessing
("processing" is just too much of a common word).

This will provide a good short-term answer to those who still clamor
for dropping the GIL.

I'm very happy this is going forward.  It's a big win.


Raymond
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to