How a standard by ANSI, ECMA and/or ISO is any better than a standard by the
PSF?
Is PSF bad at "controlling its growth and avoiding featuritis" in your opinion
or smth?
On 12.02.2021 21:33, Dan Stromberg wrote:
What would it take to create an ANSI, ECMA and/or ISO standard for Python?
It seems to have really helped C.
It looks like Java isn't standardized, and it's done OK, though perhaps it was healthier in the past - before Oracle decided API's were
ownable.
I think standardizing Python might be really good for controlling its growth
and avoiding featuritis.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/JZYW4JOTANYIOLYDQ6YHRUP2TWO52OAE/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
--
Regards,
Ivan
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/ZBKXMHWFEIWGP7FZJDZPNPV7TEXANMIV/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
