On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 18:32 +0100, Johan Dahlin wrote:
> A couple of moments ago I branched PyGTK for Gtk+ 2.5.x work.
More or less at the same time I had branched gnome-python too, but
just kept quiet about it :)
If there ever was an API you missed in gnome-python, now is the time
to file a bug report! Patches are welcome, but just saying 'function
xyz is missing' is good too.
Next destination is GNOME 2.10[1] developer platform. Soon we'll have
to decide (or I'll decide if there's no consensus) between:
1- split non-devel-platform modules out of gnome-python (aka the
minimal split);
2- split everything up, one module per package (aka the full split).
I for one prefer the minimal split...
Regards.
[1] We probably won't have time to target GNOME 2.8, or is not worth the
effort.
--
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The universe is always one step beyond logic
_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
