On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 01:09:47PM +0000, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: > On Sat, 2004-11-06 at 18:32 +0100, Johan Dahlin wrote: > > A couple of moments ago I branched PyGTK for Gtk+ 2.5.x work. > > More or less at the same time I had branched gnome-python too, but > just kept quiet about it :) > > If there ever was an API you missed in gnome-python, now is the time > to file a bug report! Patches are welcome, but just saying 'function > xyz is missing' is good too. > > Next destination is GNOME 2.10[1] developer platform. Soon we'll have > to decide (or I'll decide if there's no consensus) between: > 1- split non-devel-platform modules out of gnome-python (aka the > minimal split); > 2- split everything up, one module per package (aka the full split). > > I for one prefer the minimal split... >
I agree. My vote weight nearly zero, since I don't code... -- Tom Cato Amundsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.solfege.org/ GNU Solfege - free ear training http://www.gnu.org/software/solfege/ _______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
