Sex, 2004-11-05 �s 15:33 +0000, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro escreveu:
> Sex, 2004-11-05 �s 08:22 -0700, Robert Uhl escreveu:
> > "Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > 
> > >   Yes.  I am a bad gnome-python maintainer and forgot to migrate some
> > > gnome-python classes to the new property-based constructors, which allow
> > > transparent __init__ parent chaining.  gnome.Canvas is still using old
> > > constructor system, therefore you must replace this:
> > >           gnome.canvas.Canvas.__init__(self, aa=aa)
> > > with this:
> > >           self.__gobject_init__(aa=aa)
> > > (or something like that)
> > 
> > Ah, I see.  Is the old method forward-compatible (i.e., when the bug
> > is fixed, will the old method still work?)?
> 
>   Yes.  __gobject_init__ may eventually become deprecated in pygtk 2.6,
> not will be kept for compatibility.  We are forbidden to break API.

  ^^^^^^^
  Oops, I meant "but will be kept for compatibility".

> 
>   And to answer kiko's earlier question: no, neither bug report nor cvs
> commit to fix this yet :-P
> 
> > 
> > BTW, any plans to auto-generate documentation for gnome-python as for
> > PyGTK?
> > 
> > Thanks for all the good work.  Gnome-python and PyGTK are a dream come
> > true.  It's amazing how quickly my app is coming together.
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> pygtk mailing list   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
> Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
-- 
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The universe is always one step beyond logic.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
pygtk mailing list   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk
Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/

Reply via email to