Seg, 2004-11-08 �s 15:56 -0200, Christian Robottom Reis escreveu: > On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 03:33:44PM +0000, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote: > > > > Yes. I am a bad gnome-python maintainer and forgot to migrate some > > > > gnome-python classes to the new property-based constructors, which allow > > > > transparent __init__ parent chaining. gnome.Canvas is still using old > > > > constructor system, therefore you must replace this: > > > > gnome.canvas.Canvas.__init__(self, aa=aa) > > > > with this: > > > > self.__gobject_init__(aa=aa) > > > > (or something like that) > > > > > > Ah, I see. Is the old method forward-compatible (i.e., when the bug > > > is fixed, will the old method still work?)? > > > > Yes. __gobject_init__ may eventually become deprecated in pygtk 2.6, > > not will be kept for compatibility. We are forbidden to break API. > > > > And to answer kiko's earlier question: no, neither bug report nor cvs > > commit to fix this yet :-P > > How about you or someone who has a clue about this filing one so I can > delete one more item of email from my inbox? :-)
Don't bother. Fixed in CVS. I guess I was just waiting for the weekend... > > Take care, > -- > Christian Robottom Reis | http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 3361 2331 -- Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> The universe is always one step beyond logic.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ pygtk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.daa.com.au/mailman/listinfo/pygtk Read the PyGTK FAQ: http://www.async.com.br/faq/pygtk/
