Hi, thanks for your answer :) No, I'm not suscribed to puppet-dev, just to puppet-users, so I definetly missed it, my bad. Glad to hear things are moving!
Thanks again for the follow up and keep up with the good work :) On Friday, January 3, 2014 6:09:54 PM UTC+1, Eric Sorenson wrote: > > > > On Jan 3, 2014, at 5:11 AM, Fabio Sangiovanni > <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > > > Ok, I get it. First rule of data in modules: you don't talk about data > in modules. > > > > Hah! No, I just don't like to reply until I have something substantial to > report. Did you see this thread from a couple of weeks ago? It was only on > puppet-dev so if you're following this in puppet-users you may have missed > it: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/puppet-dev/f0KrpOtfKRY/discussion > > Next steps out of that were that I'm pulling together a google doc, which > I haven't finished yet due to holidays. > > I'm excited that people are working with the module_data implementation. > The main technical concern I have is forward and backward compatibility: > how should a module express that it needs a particular implementation of > DIM? > > > Eric Sorenson - [email protected] <javascript:> - freenode > #puppet: eric0 > puppet platform // coffee // techno // bicycles -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/69d4fd4c-f7d4-49b9-aa28-e4bdff4751c9%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
