On Jan 3, 2014, at 5:11 AM, Fabio Sangiovanni <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, I get it. First rule of data in modules: you don't talk about data in > modules. > Hah! No, I just don't like to reply until I have something substantial to report. Did you see this thread from a couple of weeks ago? It was only on puppet-dev so if you're following this in puppet-users you may have missed it: https://groups.google.com/d/topic/puppet-dev/f0KrpOtfKRY/discussion Next steps out of that were that I'm pulling together a google doc, which I haven't finished yet due to holidays. I'm excited that people are working with the module_data implementation. The main technical concern I have is forward and backward compatibility: how should a module express that it needs a particular implementation of DIM? Eric Sorenson - [email protected] - freenode #puppet: eric0 puppet platform // coffee // techno // bicycles -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/D534B40E-DD52-4EEC-B5DC-163FF5CD54AC%40puppetlabs.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
