I received marketing email this morning about "Puppet Application Orchestration". I'm guessing this is related to PRFC-6 and the recent PR's for PUP-XXXXs that are not publicly accessible.
If this feature is indeed related to PRFC-6, the index page lists this PRFC as being in "draft" status. Per PRFC-0, the approval process is supposed to be draft -> posted -> submitted -> candidate -> funded -> completed. I don't recall any discussion on this list other than the issues that can up with "application" became a reserved word. To be clear, I am not complaining about features being developed behind closed doors. Rather, I'm wondering why the PRFC process was [potentially] not followed for a major feature? Is there not enough community engagement? Is it too slow? Is it a failed experiment at this point? -Josh -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-dev/560D88ED.3090806%40hoblitt.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
