Dojo changed this to dodo.query, see http://blog.dojotoolkit.org/2007/02/04/dojoquery-a-css-query-engine-for-dojo
On 2/6/07, Christophe Jolif <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jan 2007 13:41:10 +0530, Anne van Kesteren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Given the input from Björn I suppose there's no real need for a method >> that returns a single element node (assuming implementations make that >> optimization). Given that, I propose we rename .getAll() to >> .getElementsBySelector() and drop .get() (on both Document and Element). >> >> One advantage is that it's consistent with the naming people already use >> for custom written functions that have this functionality. In theory it's >> also not harder to type than .getElementsByTagName(). The only thing that >> makes it differ from the other getElementsBy* method(s) is that it doesn't >> return a live NodeList. I don't see that as a major problem. >> >> If there are no strong objections I'll implement this in the specification. > > Not having heard strong objections, and having had support for > getElementsBySelector() that is at least as strong as anything else, I think (with > my chair's hat) this can be taken as the current resolution of the naming debate. > > Which would also resolve ISSUE-110. > > Any objections? +1 And I notice dojo has a dojo.getElementsByClass function, so it looks like very similar to the current naming for a similar functionality in existing widespread toolkit out there. -- Christophe
-- erik
