On 2007-02-06 14:58, Christophe Jolif wrote:
Hi David,
David Håsäther wrote:
On 2007-02-06 14:07, Christophe Jolif wrote:
Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
Not having heard strong objections, and having had support for
getElementsBySelector() that is at least as strong as anything else,
I think (with my chair's hat) this can be taken as the current
resolution of the naming debate.
Which would also resolve ISSUE-110.
Any objections?
+1
Why? Because dojo has a method with a different name (not very similar
in my opinion) that does something completely different?
1/ My support to this decision is not linked to what I just discovered
in dojo (actually just while typing my email) but just the consequence
of the arguments I already stated several times on this same list. In
short: everyone is not as omniscient as the "web short naming gurus",
most people need descriptive names to do their every day job correctly
with the tons of API they have to cope in today programming word.
Sorry, I think I misunderstood you. I thought your "+1" was an
objection, but I take it you meant that you support the
"getElementsBySelector" proposal. If so, I agree with you :-)
--
David Håsäther
