On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 at 10:07, Ben Kochie <[email protected]> wrote:

> I think that PR link is incorrect.
>
> Yes, I think we should consider dropping 32-bit official builds. Unless we
> can reduce the amount of mmap'd data.
>

The amount of mmapping we do is only going to increase.


>
> One thing I noticed when running on a 32-bit machine a while back was that
> the mmap'd data is mapped multiple times for different OS threads. Setting 
> GOMAXPROCS=1
> helped, but only a little.
>

That doesn't sound right, we do map some files more than once (particularly
during compaction) but not per thread.


> There was some discussion about doing mmap on demand, but there was not
> enough interest in 32-bit to consider spending the time.
>

Even if all that complexity was added and the lack of predictable
performance was acceptable, you'd still be limited to rather small data
sizes. I don't think there's much point complicating the codebase for the
sake of a Prometheus that can't handle more than a few hundred MB of data.

Brian


>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 3:05 PM Julien Pivotto <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear developers,
>>
>> Based on this comment from Brian, should we stop providing official 32
>> bit builds
>> of Prometheus?
>>
>> > 2.19 requires more virtual memory than previous versions, you need a
>> > 64bit machine. 32bit system are generally not supported as we use mmap
>> > a lot, if you want to try to get it to work you can but we don't
>> > promise anything there as trying to support 32bit systems would
>> > cripple things for the vast majority of our users on 64bit systems. I
>> > can only suggest looking at Prometheus 1.x, which did not use mmap.
>>
>> https://github.com/prometheus/prometheus/pull/7686#issuecomment-682534007
>>
>> If we build them but not recommend them, that seems like a waste of time
>> and resources.
>>
>> --
>> Julien Pivotto
>> @roidelapluie
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Prometheus Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/20200828130516.GA1428921%40oxygen
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Prometheus Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CABbyFmrkuKc-VHAxydAHEO3PwA95V_tBu0WuuUQ-7c654mS%2Bzg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CABbyFmrkuKc-VHAxydAHEO3PwA95V_tBu0WuuUQ-7c654mS%2Bzg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>


-- 
Brian Brazil
www.robustperception.io

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prometheus Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CAHJKeLqHT724Uj9%3D7KiWZg%3DWuRwEaaOFZEZxb6TPF-gD9JkuMw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to