On 2020/07/29 09:36, Austin Hook wrote: > > Probably got my packages messed up at some point, and should just stop > doing endless "upgrades", and start clean with 6.7, but for learning > purposes and perspective, would appreciate tips on why doing a pkg_add of > firefox under 6.6 would fail, while looking for a version of atk that that > is not in the packages for 6.6? > > > farm# pkg_add firefox > quirks-3.187 signed on 2020-05-19T14:41:48Z > Can't install firefox-72.0.2 because of libraries > |library atk-1.0.21809.3 not found > ... > > But looking at: > > https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.6/packages/amd64/ > > I only see: atk-2.... and no atk-1....
atk-1.0.21809.3 reported by pkg_add in the "library not found" line refers to the library version (file /usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so.21809.3) not the package version (this library is contained in the atk-2.32.0 package). > > -------------------------- <clip> ---------------------- > at-spi2-core-2.32.1.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 258681 > atari800-4.1.0.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 408617 > atf-0.18p3.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 1129085 > atk-2.32.0.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 461597 > atk2mm-2.28.0.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 1238387 > atlas-0.4.3.1p10.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 2360270 > atomicparsley-0.9.6p3.tgz 12-Oct-2019 06:06 138835 > --------------------------- </clip> ----------------------- > > I realize that there are dependencies of dependencies going on here. but > for perspective, why wouldn't atk-1... exist in the same package > repository as the 6.6 version of firefox does, if that version (or > probably it's other dependencies) requires it. Wouldn't package testing > have failed for firefox when it was tested for 6.6? And if not, why not? > > Thanks in advance, for any comment. > > Austin Hook > > > > > > Could you show the full output from these please? echo $PKG_PATH cat /etc/installurl pkg_add -u pkg_info
