On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 10:32:08PM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > On Tue Jan 28, 2020 at 12:53:32PM -0700, Aaron Bieber wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 at 16:50:11 +0100, Solene Rapenne wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 06:30:37AM +0100, Rafael Sadowski wrote: > > > > Facts: Qt4 synergy application, last update 2010, upstream dead. > > > > > > > > Synergy looks also more or less dead as open-source: > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synergy_(software) > > > > https://synergy-foss.org/ > > > > > > > > BTW, Qt4 ports in the category "net" no longer make sense to. > > > > > > > > OK to remove? > > > > > > > > > > ok for removing net/qsynergy but net/synergy is still useful, I > > > installed it last week for openbsd->windows and it works fine. I've > > > tried qsynergy and it wasn't helpful at all. > > > > There is also barrier which I sent a while back: > > > > https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=157127455812780&w=2 > > https://github.com/jasperla/openbsd-wip/tree/master/net/barrier > > > > (also, woops, just noticed I checked the tarball in :P) > > > > It uses qt5 and is more actively maintained! > > Sounds like a plan to replace net/synergy with net/barrier, right? > Paco Esteban has already tested. > > > > > > > > > > -- > > PGP: 0x1F81112D62A9ADCE / 3586 3350 BFEA C101 DB1A 4AF0 1F81 112D 62A9 ADCE > >
I switched to barrier, GUI worked perfectly!
