On Jan 24 00:19:40, schwa...@usta.de wrote: > Obviously, this is only yet another low-quality man(7) generator > (emitting pointless low-level roff(7) code, lots of bogus .P, > incorrectly encoded dashes, using low-level font escapes rather > than proper man(7) macros, failing to properly generate .MT > and .UR, ... - and that's just from inspecting the thirty line > file scdoc.1 itself) so using it certainly isn't encouraged. > > But given that some people use it anyway for documentating their > software, i agree that a port is needed, even if only as a dependency > for other, potentially more useful ports.
What ports are those? (I would grep for the dependency, but that does not exist yet.) Jan
