On 2020/01/22 23:34, Raymond E. Pasco wrote: > Having looked at it a bit more, I see other statically linked ports with > empty WANTLIB (e.g. shells/tcsh), but that doesn't necessarily mean it's > correct. Since I don't know, here's another tgz identical to the last > but with WANTLIB=c (which, if you remove -static, is what it would > require).
Please don't statically link it. The few ports doing this are special cases.
