On 30/08/19 12:49 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019/08/30 10:30, Robert Nagy wrote:
> > On 29/08/19 20:47 +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > Additional comment, isn't it going to need sslmitm to be enabled if it's 
> > > going
> > > to do anything useful with the current state of the 'net?
> > > 
> > 
> > Well not really. For example in my use case it is only used for filtering.
> > Blocking specific website groups and allowing some of them during lunch 
> > hours.
> > 
> > Since every client is forced to use the proxy, https filtering will work 
> > with
> > the CONNECT method. The only drawback of this is that you don't get 
> > redirected
> > to the blocked page if you are using https, but you will get an ssl error 
> > instead.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Robert Nagy
> > 
> 
> The main reason to use dansguardian/e2guardian is the content filtering
> though, if you're just blocking by time/site name pretty much anything can
> handle that (squid/trafficserver/..)
> 

I've tried and they all suck big time, especially squid/squidguard. e2guardian 
works
anyway ... this does not matter now.

-- 
Robert Nagy

Reply via email to