On 2019/06/24 23:29, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2019/06/25 00:06, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> > Logically obvious to me; any reasons not to do it?
>
> Yes - "make patch" may have failed but you still want to update files
> for whichever of the patches *did* manage to get applied.
>
> > Basically, I expected this dependency when updating a port but was
> > mistaken:
> >
> > $ make extract
> > [...]
> > $ make update-patches
> > WRKDIST=/usr/ports/pobj/git-2.22.0/git-2.22.0 does not exist
> > *** Error 1 in /usr/ports/devel/git
> > (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2467 'update-patches':
> > @toedit=`WRKDIST=/usr/ports/pobj/git-2....)
> >
> > Feedback? OK?
> >
> > Index: bsd.port.mk
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk,v
> > retrieving revision 1.1471
> > diff -u -p -r1.1471 bsd.port.mk
> > --- bsd.port.mk 16 Jun 2019 14:27:42 -0000 1.1471
> > +++ bsd.port.mk 24 Jun 2019 21:51:25 -0000
> > @@ -2457,7 +2457,7 @@ _internal-plist _internal-update-plist:
> > @${_MAKE} _internal-generate-readmes
> > @${_update_plist}
> >
> > -update-patches:
> > +update-patches: ${_PATCH_COOKIE}
> > @toedit=`WRKDIST=${WRKDIST} PATCHDIR=${PATCHDIR} \
> > PATCH_LIST='${PATCH_LIST}' DIFF_ARGS='${DIFF_ARGS}' \
> > DISTORIG=${DISTORIG} PATCHORIG=${PATCHORIG} \
> >
>
PS, I find this alias useful:
$ alias mup
mup='make makesum && make patch && make update-patches'
