On 2019/06/25 00:06, Klemens Nanni wrote:
> Logically obvious to me; any reasons not to do it?
Yes - "make patch" may have failed but you still want to update files
for whichever of the patches *did* manage to get applied.
> Basically, I expected this dependency when updating a port but was
> mistaken:
>
> $ make extract
> [...]
> $ make update-patches
> WRKDIST=/usr/ports/pobj/git-2.22.0/git-2.22.0 does not exist
> *** Error 1 in /usr/ports/devel/git
> (/usr/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk:2467 'update-patches':
> @toedit=`WRKDIST=/usr/ports/pobj/git-2....)
>
> Feedback? OK?
>
> Index: bsd.port.mk
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/ports/infrastructure/mk/bsd.port.mk,v
> retrieving revision 1.1471
> diff -u -p -r1.1471 bsd.port.mk
> --- bsd.port.mk 16 Jun 2019 14:27:42 -0000 1.1471
> +++ bsd.port.mk 24 Jun 2019 21:51:25 -0000
> @@ -2457,7 +2457,7 @@ _internal-plist _internal-update-plist:
> @${_MAKE} _internal-generate-readmes
> @${_update_plist}
>
> -update-patches:
> +update-patches: ${_PATCH_COOKIE}
> @toedit=`WRKDIST=${WRKDIST} PATCHDIR=${PATCHDIR} \
> PATCH_LIST='${PATCH_LIST}' DIFF_ARGS='${DIFF_ARGS}' \
> DISTORIG=${DISTORIG} PATCHORIG=${PATCHORIG} \
>
