>Could you please explain the logic behind this as I am confused. Is this >due to an inefficient process, technical limitation, or other reason >(lack of manpower doesn't qualify as that seems self inflicted by the >project)? Are you somehow tracking submissions to take care of when this >unlocked so people don't waste their time needing to resubmit them?
Our process. *OUR* process. This is not your process. Meaning it isn't your decision. >While they may exist I know of no other project, including OS, that halt >development like this for long, if at all, to do a release. Again, they >may exist I just don't know of any and find the process awkward and >confusing. Other projects split their developers between "making the release" and "working on the future", and as a result they take a long time to make crappier releases. That's their choice. It is not our choice. It is *NOT YOUR CHOICE*, and you don't have standing to comment.
