On 2018-08-23 23:53, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2018/08/23 01:01, Pavel Korovin wrote:
On 08/20, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> You could do this via quirks with naming like *-oss and *-nonfree
> and have a "rename elastic -> elastic-oss" quirk, but I think (even if
> we aren't providing ftp packages) that it can't be done while keeping
> the plain "elastic" name around (the quirk would keep on applying, so
> somebody installing from ports locally and then doing "pkg_add -u"
> could have it "sidegraded" to the oss version).
It seems the juice isn't worth the squeeze of maintaining non-free
versions, I rather incline towards leaving only Apache-licensed
versions.
Do you think it's OK to leave packages names as is, or better to
rename
it to *-oss (and add appropriate lines to devel/quirks) to match
official
names?
Personally I would leave as-is.
Seconded, don't bother with the renaming and perhaps make a note in the
DESCR
this is a package of the non-restricted version.
Cheers,
--
jasper
