On 2018/08/23 01:01, Pavel Korovin wrote: > On 08/20, Stuart Henderson wrote: > > You could do this via quirks with naming like *-oss and *-nonfree > > and have a "rename elastic -> elastic-oss" quirk, but I think (even if > > we aren't providing ftp packages) that it can't be done while keeping > > the plain "elastic" name around (the quirk would keep on applying, so > > somebody installing from ports locally and then doing "pkg_add -u" > > could have it "sidegraded" to the oss version). > > It seems the juice isn't worth the squeeze of maintaining non-free > versions, I rather incline towards leaving only Apache-licensed versions. > > Do you think it's OK to leave packages names as is, or better to rename > it to *-oss (and add appropriate lines to devel/quirks) to match official > names?
Personally I would leave as-is.
