anyone?

On Sun May 06, 2018 at 09:21:50PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> On Sun May 06, 2018 at 01:23:43PM -0400, Brian Callahan wrote:
> > 
> > On 05/05/18 07:29, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > > *ping*
> > > 
> > > On Wed Apr 25, 2018 at 09:31:02PM +0200, Rafael Sadowski wrote:
> > > > Hi ports@
> > > > 
> > > > Attached is a new port for bitcoin. Long time ago pascal@ started
> > > > working on bitcoin in openbsd-wip. I've finished this work and run a 
> > > > full
> > > > bitcoin node over weeks without problems so far:
> > > > 
> > > > https://twitter.com/sizeofvoid/status/976586173538885632
> > > > 
> > > > $ cat net/bitcoin/pkg/DESCR
> > > > 
> > > > Bitcoin is an experimental new digital currency that enables instant
> > > > payments to anyone, anywhere in the world. Bitcoin uses peer-to-peer
> > > > technology to operate with no central authority: managing transactions
> > > > and issuing money are carried out collectively by the network.
> > > > Bitcoin is also the name of the open source software which enables
> > > > the use of this currency.
> > > > 
> > > > Ok? Comments?
> > > > 
> > > > Greetings to the hackerroom.
> > > > 
> > > > Rafael Sadowski
> > > 
> > 
> > It reads and builds ok, and bitcoin-qt even launches.
> > I am not going to download the 200GB (!!!) that it wants me to, so that's as
> > far as I can test.
> > portcheck -N complains about hardcoded paths in pkg/bitcoind.rc
> > 
> > One thought from me: is there no hope for this to build on !CLANG_ARCHS?
> > (You only have COMPILER=base-clang ports-clang). Maybe that is the right way
> > to go, since I'm guessing you wouldn't want to run this on a machine that
> > doesn't have clang available to it since it's probably far too slow.
> > 
> > In that case, you don't need that CXXFLAGS line.
> > 
> 
> It doesn't build with ports-gcc and you already said it: "... you
> wouldn't want to run this on a machine that doesn't have clang available
> to it since it's probably far too slow."
> 
> Yes builds fine without CXXFLAGS. Ok with /var -> ${VARBASE}?
> 
> Thanks for test and review!
> 

Reply via email to